Mergify vs Aviator

Both handle merge queues well. The difference is what comes with it: CI observability, merge governance, multi-CI support, and a rule engine that adapts to your workflow.

Feature comparison

Aviator

Mergify

Speculative checks

CI batching with bisect-on-failure

Two-step CI

Monorepo / scope-aware batching

PR priorities

Multiple levels

Queue pause

API only
UI + API

Queue freeze (scheduled)

Auto-retry on CI failure

Custom merge conditions (rule engine)

Basic
Full YAML rule engine

Queue stats dashboard

Monitoring integrations (Datadog)

CI Insights (flaky detection, job health)

Basic analytics
Full product

Slack notifications (CI + queue activity)

Full event log

PR summary reports (GitHub comments)

Merge Protections (freezes, dependencies)

Full product

Billing by active contributors only

Per seat
Active contributors

Fast-forward merge

On-premise deployment

Trusted by the best engineering teams

From fast-moving startups to well-known enterprises

CerebrasJ.P. MorganLuminarBack MarketSiFiveCerebrasJ.P. MorganLuminarBack MarketSiFive

More than a merge queue

Aviator sells a merge queue. Mergify includes merge queue, CI observability, and merge governance in every plan. Here's what that means in practice.

Three products in one: Merge Queue, CI Insights, and Merge Protections included in every plan
Scheduled freeze windows for releases, holidays, and maintenance periods
Full YAML rule engine for custom merge conditions (labels, files, authors, schedules)
Monitoring integrations with Datadog for queue health alerting
Fair billing: only active contributors count (inactive users are free)
Running since 2018 with 8 years of GitHub edge case handling in production

Evaluating merge queue tools?

We'll walk you through how Mergify compares for your specific setup. No pitch, just answers.

Book a discovery call

Early on, as the team, tests, and CI complexity grew, it was quite clear that we needed an automated tool to resolve bottlenecks. Our team loves the way Mergify solved our growing pains.

Tomasz Biernacki

Tomasz Biernacki

Quality Assurance Engineer at Pitch

What Aviator doesn't cover

Aviator focuses on the merge queue. These are the gaps teams notice when they need more.

No scheduled freeze windows

Aviator can pause the queue via API, but has no scheduled freeze windows for releases, holidays, maintenance periods, or deploy cycles.

No Merge Protections

Aviator handles merge queues but has no equivalent to Merge Protections for PR dependencies, scheduled merges, time-based rules, or cross-repo coordination.

Basic merge rules

Aviator supports conditional checks, but lacks the full YAML rule engine Mergify offers for matching on labels, files, authors, and time windows.

No Datadog integration

No way to pipe queue metrics into your existing monitoring stack. Mergify integrates with Datadog for alerting on queue health.

Parallel mode resets

In Aviator's parallel mode, if one PR fails, all subsequent PRs in the queue must be re-validated from scratch.

No event log or audit trail

No full event log for queue activity. Mergify logs every queue event so you can trace what happened and why.

Mergify is a no-brainer. If you want to have your main branch always working then you have to introduce some merge queue functionality.

Paco Sevilla

Paco Sevilla

DevOps Engineer at DeepDrive

The pricing question

Aviator's merge queue starts at $12/user/month. Mergify starts at $21/user/month, but that includes CI Insights and Merge Protections in every plan. The $21 gets you a merge queue, CI observability, merge governance, and Datadog integration. Aviator charges $12 for the merge queue alone.

Both offer free tiers for small teams. Mergify is free for up to 5 users on private repos. Aviator is free for up to 15 users (merge queue only).

Try the complete CI platform

Merge queue, CI insights, and merge protections. All included, up to 5 users free.